Jump to content

Talk:Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POV check template

[edit]

Hi, I've added Template:POV check to this page. The article seems to be written in a style promoting the organization, but I am relatively new to navigating such issues on Wikipedia, so it would be great to have other people evaluate. One of my concerns is that The Legend of Proposition 13 (references 5, 9, and 12) is a self-published book written by the organization's former president, Joel Fox (see California Proposition 13 (1978)#Further reading). Additionally, there may be an over-reliance on primary sources such as the organization's own website. --Certainstars (talk) 19:56, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've started working on some edits to the main and History sections to address the issues I see, but the rest of the sections could definitely use closer attention, and probably some degree of re-organization. Additionally, it seems like legal action/filing lawsuits is a big area of activity for the organization (see https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article212278954.html, http://alpenhornnews.com/court-dismisses-fire-fee-lawsuit-p8556-155.htm), but this isn't discussed currently in the article. Certainstars (talk) 06:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]