Talk:How to Survive a Plague

AIDS Top‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject AIDS, an attempt to build a comprehensive, detailed, and accessible guide to AIDS, HIV, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.AIDSWikipedia:WikiProject AIDSTemplate:WikiProject AIDSAIDS articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Documentary / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on How to Survive a Plague. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120923222649/http://gawker.com/5945317/how-to-survive-a-plague-how-to-make-an-uplifting-documentary-about-aids to http://gawker.com/5945317/how-to-survive-a-plague-how-to-make-an-uplifting-documentary-about-aids

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation:

- Article Evaluated: How to Survive a Plague

After reading the article, How to Survive a Plague, I have come to the conclusion that the article seems to be rather vague. The article is nothing more than a movie summary, though the summary is detailed and gives a good synopsis of the movie it could have been more detailed, and had more background information that helped give facts behind what sparked the creation of the movie. Everything that is included in the article is relevant, there just could be more information. The article in itself is a bit of a distraction, simply becasue of the set up of the page and the various brightly colored font that is randomly included, other than that the page is very straight foward and brief. The information that is presented is accurate and current/relevant to today. Due to the movie being relativly new, everything seems to be up to date and the information flows in a logical, and chronological way. The author of the article did a very good job at remaining neutral on the topic and only presenting information that was relevant to the movie and the movie topic. There was no bias and the information was very straight foward and to the point. Outside of the information presented in the article, everything is excellent. All of the links work and are very insightful/helpful to understadning the article as a whole. The source links are credible and backed up with facts; in addition to that, there are many references, all relveant to the article, the movie, and the topic of the movie. Overall, I enjoyed the article, and I also like the fact that the article is apart of a Wikiproject. The information was clear and to the point and is on an intresting topic, the article kept me engaed and is very relevant to today, which makes the article relatable.

NiaSavon (talk) 20:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC) NiaSavon[reply]

Nice job.Cassell04 (talk) 23:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]