Jump to content

Talk:Hoverter and Sholl Box Huckleberry Natural Area

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

[edit]

"The smallest natural area in Pennsylvania" is a pseudofact that might be avoided. There are of course many natural areas, even in Pennsylvania, though they are not officially so designated. "The smallest natural area in Pennsylvania" reveals a bureaucrat's viewpoint that may strike the ordinary reader as mysterious or ridiculous. --Wetman (talk) 14:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it to "The smallest Natural Area in Pennsylvania" to make it clear that I'm referring to state-designated tracts of land. Choess (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoverter and Sholl Box Huckleberry Natural Area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent error?

[edit]

In the History section of the page, the 1st paragraph reads (italics added): The specimen of box huckleberry at the natural area has been estimated, based on its observed rate of growth and clonal reproduction, to be 1,200[5] to 1,300 years old,[1] only a tenth of the estimated age for a nearby colony at Losh Run.[6] Bold textThe colony was discovered by Spencer Baird in 1845.[7] No specimens of box huckleberry had been collected since 1805Bold text, and Baird's discovery allowed Asa Gray to classify the species as Gaylussacia brachycera.[8] The resulting correspondence sparked a lifelong friendship between the two, and helped Baird attain a post at the Smithsonian Institution.[5]

How was it discovered first by someone, yet decades earlier someone else discovered it and took specimens of it? Perhaps I am missing something? SusquehannaMan (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]