Talk:Houston Symphony
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Houston Symphony article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External link
[edit]Hi. I'd like to add a video interview with Matthew VanBesien to external links. He is talking about the Houston Symphony. Here is the interview. Ammosh11 17:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Removing Beecham note
[edit]The following note recently appeared in the article. It seems non-encyclopedic in tone, so I have removed it to the talk page:
"Note: This page has just previously listed Sir Thomas Beecham as also music director of the Houston Symphony in 1954. This is misinformation that has erroneously appeared in Houston Symphony programs for a long time, to gloss over how important the appointment to music director Ferenc Fricsay was in 1954. In fact, Sir Thomas Beecham never conducted here in 1954 - at least not as part of the 1954-55 season until a month or two into 1955. He conducted instead four weekends of concerts at the end of the 1954-55 season, the Verdi Requiem among which, it is quite obviously, with Maria Stader to have been originally and Gabor Carelli still a soloist in it, to have been originally assigned at the end of that season to Ferenc Fricsay.
"Sir Thomas Beecham was a very intestimably fine musician in his own right and if having seen such willful error himself had sufficient integrity to have wanted to disavow the claim, one can be sure. He was either not fully abreast of the circumstances surrounding Fricsay's departure from here or most likely felt a bit embarrassed once he did know to have taken Fricsay's place in such dishonorable circumstances as happened that season." Emoll (talk) 13:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
List of musicians
[edit]User:DJRafe removed the list of musicians from the article, giving as a rationale "it doesn't really add anything." I am not sure what is meant by that. Yes, it adds a list of musicians, past and present, from the Houston Symphony who have been sufficiently notable to have their own articles in Wikipedia. The Wikipedia articles for virtually every city and town, every high school and college, every national fraternity or sorority, etc., includes a list of notable residents or alumni. Why shouldn't the same be true for a professional orchestra, whose members more directly and integrally constitute the group (and a small, elite group at that)? In Wikipedia articles on rock groups, should the names of the individuals in the group be removed wherever they appear? I strongly disagree with the reasons given for the removal, and I am restoring the list. 173.173.120.49 (talk) 14:12, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- I totally agree, the musicians should remain. Most if not all performing arts groups will include the name of the performers, especially if they have a linked article. In my opinion, DJRafe's removal could be considered borderline vandalism by many editors. Postoak (talk) 20:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
DJRafe removed the list again; I have restored it and added a request on the edit page to bring disagreements to the talk page. 24.243.2.93 (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Houston Symphony. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116225602/http://www.icsom.org/bulletins/houston03.pdf to http://www.icsom.org/bulletins/houston03.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)