Talk:House v. Napolitano

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. Further details are available [[1]].

Untitled

Needs rephrasing: "and that information regarding the chain of custody and whether or not information was copied from his devices." --Jethrogb (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Arguments section could use more WP:Links--Jethrogb (talk)

Use past tense. From the checklist: Correct grammar, verb tenses, and spelling? [Common mistake: multiple verb tenses throughout article. Most of the topics of these articles describe past events, so use past tense consistently throughout. "The plaintiff argued...The defendant responded...The court decided..." NOT The Plaintif argues...The defendant responds...The court decides..."] --Jethrogb (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page is currently an WP:Orphan [2], I will try to find some pages that can link here, but you should do the same. --Jethrogb (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you didn't move over the page but copied the content, so the revision history got lost --Jethrogb (talk) 23:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the DYK nomination, any suggestions on which fact from your page would be good for "Did you know ..."? --Jethrogb (talk) 00:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the editing and all the feedback; I'll get to work on it once my work schedule lightens up a bit. I've talked with professor and am intending to expand the "Settlement" section as he feels it is the most important aspect of the case. Keien Ohta (talk) 08:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]