Talk:House of Hell
You may prefer to discuss this article on the talk page for the List of Fighting Fantasy gamebooks article |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Ff7wizard.jpg
[edit]Image:Ff7wizard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Suppression of the graph structure of the story
[edit]A gamebook can be represented as a directed graph, and it is a widely used representation for such books. For that reason I think the inclusion of the graph structure of House of Hell should not be considered as an original research, although I made that graph myself. --Gokimines (talk) 21:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- I am open to hearing the views of others, but if you have generated it yourself and it is not published in a notable source then would that not be WP:OR? Also, there used to be maps on many of the FF gamebook articles, but they were nominated for deletion because: "The map is a derivative work of the fictional world created in a non-free gamebook; it is immaterial whether the user created the map." Deagol2 (talk) 23:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- I would be glad to hear other points of view. There should not be any copyright on what is nothing but an oriented graph and the deletion you're talking about seems to be an excessive decision, but I'm open to other views.--Gokimines (talk) 16:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)