Talk:House of Cards season 3

House of Cards season 3 was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 24, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

February 22 to 28, 2015 (22nd)
March 1 to 7, 2015 (8th)

A fact from House of Cards season 3 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 April 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the production of season 3 of House of Cards is being delayed and may be moved due to legislative decisions involving tax incentives?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/April.

Wikipedia

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

United States: Television

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Titles of episodes 11-13

Why hasn't this been changed to Chapters 37-39 respectively? It's on imdb and multiple other sources but the page is protected for some reason. Feudonym (talk) 06:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 27 February 2015

This edit request to House of Cards (season 3) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Updating episode list. Adding in the final 3 episodes. Niclake13 (talk) 15:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

This edit request to House of Cards (season 3) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add remaining episode titles, that have now been released; removed citations in episode table for upcoming episodes and dates, which have occurred. LLArrow (talk) 17:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level and/or your user rights have changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 03:16, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional motorcade

The motorcade which was filmed, causing traffic disruption, was real not fictional!Royalcourtier (talk) 08:18, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on House of Cards (season 3). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141008162612/http://dcist.com/2014/10/it_looks_like_house_of_cards_is_fil.php to http://dcist.com/2014/10/it_looks_like_house_of_cards_is_fil.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Unsuccessful. czar 12:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:House of Cards (season 3)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Czar (talk · contribs) 12:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article, as nominated, does not meet Wikipedia:Good article criteria#3 on breadth. For a major, widely reviewed series, the article neither cites nor summarizes the wide critical response it had. For having previously nominated House of Cards (season 2), I know you're familiar with the sources in its Critical reception section, many of whom returned with reviews for the next season. The baseline for television season articles have only increased since that nomination 10 years ago, so their absence here is a glaring omission. These critical reviews contain both analysis of the show and other details, both of which are needed for basic breadth, such as NYT, EW. I'm quite surprised to see this nominated without those addressed. Entertainment Weekly also has numerous articles on the development of season three. Hollywood Reporter has articles on individual episodes. There's also more that can be said about nearly every section of the article, such as that it was a top contender (by nomination count) in the SAG awards. Since it would take a rewrite to address this content gap (including an expansion of the lede, which does not adequately summarize the article's content) and thus is a long way from satisifying the breadth criteron, I am marking the article as a quickfail. czar 12:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.