Talk:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt/Archives/2017

This is an archive of past discussions about Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Mein Kampf Royalties?

Why is the history of this company scrubbed clean of their ownership of the rights to Mein Kampf? I know this is not going to be good for their corporate image, but they own the rights to the book in the US, have made millions off the royalties, and there has been some lack of clarity on their part about the "charitable donations" that came from this whole thing being uncovered. Shouldn't this at least be mentioned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.115.189.172 (talk) 21:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081206072324/http://www.mediabistro.com:80/galleycat/the_revolving_door/houghton_mifflin_harcourt_breakdown_nobody_could_see_this_coming_102251.asp to http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/the_revolving_door/houghton_mifflin_harcourt_breakdown_nobody_could_see_this_coming_102251.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)