Talk:Honour and Passion

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Wrong Sypnosis

This series had no gay storylines. But this is amazingly funny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by N0rm4nch3w (talk • contribs) 16:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I watched this show and i know the sypnosis is wrong too Yun Zhen 10:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know the synopsis is true to the spirit of the Singapore Armed Forces.

Think people mistaken this series for an older mediacorp series Are You My Brother?. This old army-sponsored series made more sense than Honour and Passion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BestEditorEver88 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hmmm... i think so. The two series were pretty similar, although the older one focuses more on comedy. Are You My Brother? was pretty forgettable, unlike shows like the Golden Pillow.Juggernaut999 13:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't quite have any source in hand, but IIRC, Are You My Brother is a military-based series that doesn't involve gay storylines while this recent one does. And many other differences too, but essentially the director seemed to have ripped off a bit from that series. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.116.59.28 (talk) 11:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wrong storyline? Don't think so. Must have mistaken for another series.PowerClown123 10:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the story outline was maked out. hence , it was deleted. I luv erky 11:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC) please delete[reply]

i have corrected this page (: Stormynight91 02:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious Content being added

i have undid twice the addition of dubious content to the article. Both additions are similar in essence to previously identified and reverted vandalism [1] which were in turn taken from Uncyclopedia[[2]]. I had also tried googling for any mention of this new questionable content without success. Would be great if the anonymous IPs can provide a source, else its just questionable original research at best. Just in case, however, I will be posting a description of this edit to other Singaporean editors/admins, maybe they have a more accurate take on it. In any case, As per WP:PLOTSUMNOT, it is not necessary to include every minute detail, especially if it is in doubt and removal does not affect the main article. Zhanzhao (talk) 02:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]