Jump to content

Talk:Honolulu Hale

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Original one

[edit]

There should also be a mention of the original building of this name. I will try to find sources, and perhaps a historic picture, but that is less likely. W Nowicki (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found two pictures of the original Honolulu Hale that served as the original governmental building of the Kingdom of Hawaii and later as Henry Whitney's store and post office. You should write a little about the original building. It had as great as a significance in Hawaiian history as the current building. Was this building built on the same ground as the original or something?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Honolulu Hale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]