Talk:Hong Kong Black Police

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Merge, 4 January 2020, see discussion.
no consensus, 2 May 2016, see discussion.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hong Kong Black Police redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (297)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,067)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,516) • Stub-Class articles (6,677)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (379) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,339)

Expanding the Summary

I would like to suggest expanding the summary to touch on some of the actions that have led to the police force being criticized e.g. use of excessive force, police brutality, and corruption. Mylesgoins (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate for Deletion and Removal of Material

I see that this article has been intensely pared back recently, and it is now nominated for deletion. Is there any way we can salvage some of the information that was deleted? I know this article has some POV issues, but I don't think it should be deleted. It seems that there is and was some good descriptive information here summarizing an epithet for the Hong Kong Police.

Or maybe it would be better if this article was merged with Hong Kong Police, possibly under a subsection titled "Criticism"? mgoins (talk) 23:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]