Jump to content

Talk:Hong Kong Australians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why is this separate article?

[edit]

Untitled

[edit]

Why Hong Kong gets a separate article? Why not Macau, why not Taiwan? OK Taiwan is not part of PRC but Han immigrant/descendant people from Taiwan are still chinese! (going by the same categorization that makes Malaysian chinese diaspora "Chinese") Raising Hong Kong as separate article for Australia just opens a whole can of worms.

Please give adequate justification or I will nominate for deletion Oodas Squyeemo (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, see below ... Moonraker12 (talk) 00:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hong Kong Australians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First 'Sinitic' language

[edit]

Cantonese is the mother language of the majority of youngsters in Hong Kong. Replacement of Cantonese by the PRC government is done in the mainland only, apparently.--Alvinz Talk 13:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neologism?

[edit]

I’ve removed the neologism tag: It's been here for ten years, but I can’t really see why: we have articles on numerous other Australian ethnic minorities (viz: here, and here) and Hong Kong was a legitimate separate place of origin for about a hundred years (probably still is, despite the hand-over). So I have deleted it. The original research tag is still there, though; there’s little in the way of reliable sources to back up the content. I trust everyone is OK with that. Moonraker12 (talk) 00:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]