Talk:Honda-Broderick Cup
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Honda-Broderick Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719123241/http://awards.honda.com/ to http://awards.honda.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Comments about awards
[edit]Much of the information on Wikipedia is supported by a single reference. When it comes to awards, I'm attempting to provide a pair of references for multiple reasons.
First, there's a lot of link rot in general, and having a second reference helps guard against not having a supporting reference.
Second, many of the entries have an existing reference to the award sponsors site. That satisfies the primary purpose of a reference, but typically provides no information beyond the bare fact that the award was issued to that person. In addition, if the only references in the article are to the sponsor's site, one might question whether it meets notability standards. Having references to sites other than the sponsor site helps support notability.
Third, an additional attribute of a reference is that it may provide additional information to the reader. This is more true when the reference is to an independent article about the award because it typically includes other information about the individual.
For these reasons, I am leaving the reference into the general sponsor site but trying to add independent references wherever possible.S Philbrick(Talk) 14:53, 15 March 2020 (UTC)