Talk:Homotherium

Cats High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canine length

And... How much long were it's fangs approximately?

Body length

Just to compare, their principal measurement, length I guess or height if you prefer, what was it?

Moderation?

Perhaps this disagreement over Homotherium and whether it belongs in suborder feliformia should be referred to a moderator?

--Skb8721 21:12, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not confirmed

I removed this from the article, because my sources (Alan Turner: The fossil cats and their fossil relatives) say something else.

Both Homotherium serum (American scimitar cat) and Homotherium ultimum (Asian scimitar cat) from China, as well as Homotherium latidens from Europe, were derived from the Late Pliocene - Early Pleistocene (about 2 Ma) scimitar cat (Homotherium crenatidens) a widespread Holarctic species. It, in turn, was derived from Machairodus.

--Altaileopard 09:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Homotherium serum

The scimitar-toothed cat is merely one particular species of Homotherium. Homotherium latidens is another. I suggest that this article be rewritten in a way that says this. A Panthera article wouldn't just talk about tigers or leopards. It would speak of the genus in general.Pinguinus (talk) 23:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree in every way. Its time to merge it. Before you do that, though, look at this. A reference for a documentary. Taylor Reints (talk) 05:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More species stubs have been created. They should be merged into here again. FunkMonk (talk) 10:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the Homotherium serum article should be re-created, just with much more information (so that the article would qualify as a C class or B class article). Also, the new species articles, Homotherium crusafonti and Homotherium venezuelensis shouldn't be deleted because they talk about information that is not displayed in the article. Gug01 (talk) 21:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

Well, if the species articles are going to merge here, certainly its information must be preserved. What about a section with some basic info about each species (or at least, the most well known species)? --Rextron (talk) 00:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, merging means inserting the info here. FunkMonk (talk) 11:34, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Homotherium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060323072815/http://www.beringia.com/02/02maina7.html to http://www.beringia.com/02/02maina7.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]