Talk:Homosexualities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

LGBTQ+ studies B‑class

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Addition of "criticism" section

Sxologist, in this edit you rearranged existing text in the article by adding a "Criticism" section. I reverted your edit. I'd like to explain why. Your edit not only did not improve the article, but was, in my judgment, illogical and confusing. It was illogical, because the "Reception" section includes a section titled "Overview", which is meant to summarize the book's overall reception. A book's overall reception includes the criticism it receives. If you try to add a separate section for criticism, and shift all the criticism there, the "Overview" section looses its rationale and cannot do its job properly. In addition to being illogical, your change was confusing because not all of the material you placed in the "Criticism" section was in fact concerned with criticism of the book. Please consider your edits more carefully. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]