Talk:Homo reciprocans

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Homo reciprocans article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Untitled

Should there be a section that details a criticism of this concept? Homo economicus has ones, and it would seem to do well that this one has one too.

I'm not super well versed in economic theory however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayjazz (talk • contribs) 12:52, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ayjazz ^ I don't think there's any 'criticism' of this as a concept, however I only found this page because of the link in the intro of the *Homo Economicus* page, which I do not believe should be there. Both models are valid models, and they are not 'in contrast' to each other because that's apples&oranges (if anything, they're complementary) Homo Economicus, like the mathematical models of his economic world, is strictly rational and is *not supposed to represent man as a whole*. Homo Reciprocans is an entirely different type of assessment of man, not some construct competing against, or in contrast with, Homo Economicus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.96.123.248 (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ronaldwsh. Peer reviewers: Gmagsino1, Qshablog, NickBabson.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Homo reciprocans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090725050331/http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/prin/txt/Neoch/Eco111t.html to http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/prin/txt/Neoch/Eco111t.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]