Talk:Homalozoa
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Carpoid page were merged into Homalozoa on 16 March 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Suggest merge
[edit]Since even specialist texts on extinct echinoderms give the solutes only a page or two, would it be so bad to merge Solute (echinoderm) with this article? The other Homalozoa don't even have articles, and solute is even now no more than a couple of lines. --Wtshymanski (talk) 23:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- As much as my gut instinct to keep the two pages separate entities, I think it would be best for now if we merge Solute into Homalozoa as a subsection.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:00, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Don't be sad...once the solute section grows a little, it can be put out into article space again. Think of it as bringing the tomato seedlings back into the greenhouse when there's a frost warning. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Speaking of which, we need to start a page for Melonechinus, too.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:05, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
I suggest merging in Carpoid, as the reference
- Imran Rahman (January–February 2009). "Making sense of carpoids". Geology Today. 25 (1): 34–38.
says they are the same thing: "carpoids ... are also known as homalozoans ..." —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Done