Talk:Ho-Chunk mythology

Indigenous peoples of North America Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Mid‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Untitled

Why is "Winnebago Arrival Myth" redirected here? Please clarify. It is on the list of hot myth topics. Goldenrowley 02:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Partial Blank of page

User:Diete003, I'm not sure why you just partially blanked this page, or why you left it like you do, but I'm reverting your last few edits. Heironymous Rowe (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted this talk page, as it was blanked by User:Diete003. I also noticed he left text on the article claiming an earlier revert of his edits were someone, presumably me since I was the one who reverted his edits, restoring unlicensed use of his copyrighted material. I don't know who added all of the material in this article, if it's his or not, it may be as I believe he may be Mr Dieterle, the source for alot of the citations. He left no note here and I assumed it was vandalism. Anyone wanna help me out here? Heironymous Rowe (talk) 07:19, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks user:Oxymoron83, I logged on earlier and user:Diete003 was on a rampage. I tried leaving him messages and then tried leaving messages to someone else I noticed on the history page I thought might be an admin and could help, by the time I got back you were fixing it. I've only been editing on wiki for a 6 or 8 months and have never seen anyone act like that before, lol. I wasn't sure what to do. Diete003 made a claim that this article used his copyrighted material, but I suspect he was the one who added it. Alot of the edits were by an IP user, who seems to edit in the same way diete003 does, and they don't seem to overlap. Alot of the citations and references go to the Hotchak encyclopedia, which is a pretty wide ranging collection of Ho Chunk myths, stories, etc., all written by someone named Richard Dieterle. Anyway, glad thats over. Heironymous Rowe (talk) 08:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

userdiete003, you have removed your contributions to this page. Fine, I tired of reverting it. Would you kindly stop vandalizing whats left of the page now? Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, no one individual "owns" a page. I keep trying to Wikipedia:Assume good faith, but you are making it very difficult. Would some admins please step in again?Heironymous Rowe (talk) 04:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ho-Chunk mythology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Curious similarity

Group of raven is called kagi in Sioun language. In indian languages the word kag is used for ravens. Is this just a coincidence. Serjatt4 (talk) 14:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]