Jump to content

Talk:HitClips

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources that can be used: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=hitclips+tiger+electronics&cf=all Joe Chill (talk) 00:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


this article needs information on the format of the song, what kind of media was used and what the electronic specs are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.154.184.166 (talk) 01:49, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HitClips. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

list of songs

[edit]

The list of songs that were published under this format was copied for the mos part from this personal webisite, and sometimes added by individual editors. A personal website is not a reliable source. Ideally a source like a brochure selling these should be cited. As it stands now there is no way of telling if the list is accurate or not. I would propose removing it for that reason. 1Veertje (talk) 08:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]