Talk:History of scuba diving

Section sizes

Section size for History of scuba diving (25 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	8,464	8,464
Early history	3,073	3,073
First successful scuba equipment	718	10,845
Open circuit	4,359	4,359
Closed circuit	5,768	5,768
Post WWII	11,838	19,058
Dive computers	5,742	5,742
Industry growth	1,478	1,478
Scuba training	394	23,108
Professional scuba training and certification	4,866	4,866
Recreational scuba training and certification	17,848	17,848
Research into scuba diver safety	1,227	1,227
History of specific fields of application for scuba diving	66	26,975
Military diving	7,216	7,216
Scientific diving	3,264	3,264
Recreational diving	5,493	5,493
Solo diving	3,821	3,821
Cave diving	1,104	4,874
UK history	1,914	1,914
US history	1,856	1,856
Diving on shipwrecks and other sunken structures	1,650	1,830
Origins in salvage and archaeology	77	77
Development into a recreational activity by scuba divers	103	103
Rebreather diving	411	411
References	62,573	62,573
Total	155,323	155,323

Missing sections

Constructive suggestions welcome. · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 17:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in History of scuba diving

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of History of scuba diving's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Butler":

From Dive computer: The U.S. Navy Decompression Computer Article by CAPT. Frank K. Butler, M.D. Director of Biomedical Research Naval Special Warfare Command
From Oxygen toxicity: Butler, Frank K; White, E; Twa, M (1999). "Hyperoxic myopia in a closed-circuit mixed-gas scuba diver". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine. 26 (1): 41–5. PMID 10353183. Retrieved 29 April 2009.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]