Jump to content

Talk:History of role-playing games/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Defining the Subject

A few thoughts for revision:

  • This article should show that it's part of the Wikipedia series about role-playing games.
  • Perhaps a better title would be, History of Role-playing Games so visitors don't confuse this with drama or sociology.
  • LARPs, MMORPGs, etc. also merit attention.
  • Are chronological divisions by decade the best way to organize this article?
  • This article should communicate to a general (non-gamer) audience.

Durova 09:06, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Major Edit

Proceeded with the revision I'd already been drafting when this article became a candidate for group revision. Feel welcome to improve it!

  • Transported and expanded the history section from the role-playing games article.
  • Moved the controversy section verbatim. It could use some work.
  • Added an electronic media discussion. It could use expansion.

I'd like to see a few concluding lines about virtual economies. This article still has plenty of room for improvement. Durova 02:53, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Revised Controversy

It's much longer now, but given the degree of misunderstanding in some quarters an in-depth treatment seems appropriate. Still need to work on the paragraph about Brazil. Durova 19:59, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Recent controversy

I've removed this passage from the recent controversy section:

In 2005-, two crimes in Brazil against RPG gamers shocked Brazilian society [1]; a discussion in the press about the permission of these games by parents, based on the lack of information, cruelty and format of these crimes, was exposed in the media. In Espírito Santo, the site of the crimes, law projects to ban RPG games have been initiated by religious leaders in the local deliberative assembly [2]. No sucess.[3]

First of all, the passage doesn't say what the crimes were. I suppose it was meant that readers of the article should click the external link to find out; that's not acceptable, and besides that, it's not even in English. Neither is the second link. Even setting the issue of links aside, the paragraph itself is practically unintelligible. Kafziel 18:21, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Bias template

What's the reason for the bias template being added? Which aspect of the article / controversy section is specifically seen as not conforming to the NPOV policy? I'd like to address the issue ASAP if possible. Fairsing 13:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Markml failed to provide any reasoning, so I've reverted it. Percy Snoodle 15:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Spelling correction: Roleplaying

FYI, it looks like the standard spelling used by most gaming companies in their products is "roleplaying". The hyphenated "role-playing" is an informal variant spelling. Therefore moved the page and am spell correcting the article to standardize the spelling. Dugwiki 19:14, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Spell corrected the article too, as above. Note that a couple of the links are now temporarilly broken. Am working on correcting the links.... Dugwiki 19:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vampmasq.jpg

Image:Vampmasq.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.


— Save_Us_229 20:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationales

The following images need (and do not have) fair-use rationales for this article:

Without these, the images may be removed per Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. If anyone wants these images to remain included, please add the appropriate rationales to the image pages. Thanks. Ionek (talk) 16:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

The image Image:D&d Box1st.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of role-playing games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of role-playing games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of role-playing games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_role-playing_games/Archive_1&oldid=1092072818"