Talk:History of quantum field theory

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by History Taskforce.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Issues.

While this article is pretty good, it has some issues.

Many primary (historical) references are cited, but very few secondary historical overview articles are referenced. Consequently the article reads like WP:OR. For example "A subtle and careful analysis..." implies some expert evaluating the paper and judging it "subtle" but no such expert is cited. Many or most parts of the article have this character.

The occasional secondary ref comes in oddly. In the middle of the section on the early 1950s we read "Two classic text-books from the 1960s..." with no references showing that these books where vital to the history of quantum field theory.

Quantum field theory is roughly speaking a model involving an infinite number harmonic oscillators. So it does not start with de Broglie's matter wave field model.

Willis Lamb, his Lamb shift, and his quantum radiation theory are not mentioned.

The article overlaps Quantum field theory#history which is itself too long. Johnjbarton (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Topical vs chronological organization??

Seems odd that this history, unlike almost every other history, is organized topically with dates going back and forth. It ends up reading like 12 histories rather than one.

I get that this is complex topic, but I also don't get any sense of the development of the subject. It feels more like a "here's this and here's that".

Was this design choice deliberate? Johnjbarton (talk) 03:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]