Jump to content

Talk:History of monarchy in Australia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Footnotes

[edit]

Where have the footnotes gone?--Gazzster (talk) 13:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant work! Amazing article! --Cameron (t|p|c) 19:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!--Gazzster (talk) 19:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(was one of the contributors and wrote most of the text, if you're wondering why I said that!)--Gazzster (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Misleading statement:

[edit]

Depending on the question asked, opinion polls have shown Australians have mixed feelings towards the monarchy. Some polls show a majority of Australians support the creation of a republic, while others show a majority favour retaining the current system. Generally, however, in recent years, the prevailing mood towards the monarchy suggested by most polls is one of indifference or apathy. A poll taken in early 2007 showed support for a change to republic at its lowest level since the early 1990s.Steketee, Mike; The Australian: Republican cause needs King Charles; 27 January 2007

The poll quoted states that 45% were in favour of a republic in 2007, as opposed to 36% against and (presumably) 19% indifferent. There is danger in drawing conclusions from one poll. But aside from that, it is misleading then to state 'in recent years, the prevailing mood towards the monarchy suggested by most polls is one of indifference or apathy'. Apathy represents not 20%. Hardly the 'prevailing mood'. So I will delete the unhelpful paragraph.--Gazzster (talk) 05:34, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Queen of Australia

[edit]

The photo of Elizabeth II in the article is not a photo of the Queen of Australia. It is a photo of the Queen of Canada. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.37.212.89 (talk) 07:09, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted! The Maple Leaf is unfurled gloriously in the background. We do need more portraits of Her Maj.--Gazzster (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on History of monarchy in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Precolonial period

[edit]

Were there no monarchies or monarchy-like reigns in Australia prior to the establishment of British rule? It seems this article is somewhat one-sided. ♆ CUSH ♆ 14:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If there were, evidence of them is most welcome.<Mdw0 (talk) 07:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)>[reply]

Category:History of Australia topical overviews has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. --Sm8900 (talk) 21:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]