Jump to content

Talk:History of far-right movements in France

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Could the Girondists of the French Revolution be considred RIGHT WING?

[edit]

Could the Girondists of the French Revolution be considered the first Right wing "party" in France? Merci" Thanks,(dated AMmornMNSept.7,200921stcentByDr.Edson Andre' Johnson D.D.ULC "X")ANDREMOI (talk) 22:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the Girondists were not a "far right party" in any sense. They were the moderate opposition to the "Mountain" or the "far left." In 1791, the "far right" would have been legitimists opposed to any constitution imposed upon the king. They most likely would also have believed in the divine right of kings, which the Girondists would not have believed.

This brings me to a larger point: I'm not sure what sense a page on the "far right in France" makes. Because it seems to be mostly interested in the National Front and its precursors, "radical right" makes more sense. That's because the "far right" suggests monarchists, who are alive and well in France today, but have nothing to do with the nationalist right. Monarchists and nationalists in France have a long and lively history of cooperation, but I don't think that's what this page is about--nor should it be. Panic1933 (talk) 16:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of far-right movements in France. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Group that wanted to restore Merovignian regime in the wake of WW2 (1950s at least)

[edit]

I initially read about them on Wikipedia, but I can´t even remember their name, if someone could help me and add a mention to that in this, that´d be great.

StrongALPHA (talk) 16:39 21 May 2023 — Preceding undated comment added 16:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

StrongALPHA, I would suggest asking about the group at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities. That page is more active than most article talk pages. If there is an article you could add it yourself. TSventon (talk) 10:36, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly the Priory of Sion, which is categorised as a conspiracy theory rather than a far-right movement. TSventon (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Philippe Pétain has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emiya1980 (talk) 03:26, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]