Talk:History of civil affairs in the United States Armed Forces

Military history: Technology / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[History of Panama#U.S. Presence in Panama|called to]] The anchor (#U.S. Presence in Panama) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

References

I have the references available for this article. However, its not very high on my radar. Some editors have pointed out it does not represent a worldwide view. If there are other people willing to work ont he history of British Civil Affairs, Roman CA, etc., then we will need to delineate into daughter articles. MrPrada (talk) 19:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it is meant never to cover other nations, the title should indicate the US emphasis of the article. PKKloeppel (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of civil affairs in the United States Armed Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Bolshevik operations

No mention seems to be made of the Polar Bear Expedition and American Expeditionary Force Siberia attempting to stabilize remaining elements of the Tsarist Russian government against revolutionary forces. The major difference from similar campaigns of the same era in Latin America appears to be a lack of success. Does failure to mention these anti-Bolshevik operations present a biased description of US military success during that era? Thewellman (talk) 04:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added description of post-war occupation of Russia. Thewellman (talk) 01:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]