Talk:History of Sussex

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Sussex article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sussex High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

William de Braose

The link to William de Braose currently leads to a disambiguation page. Someone with more knowledge of the topic should correct the link to go to the correct William. --Bill 23:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC) Link no longer there. Doug (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is too "wordy" - ie no headings to break up the text. I shall attempt a rewrite Peter Shearan 10:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and I have just discovered it - almost word-for-word at http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/SUS_TAV/SUSSEX.html Which one copied from which? It reads like it is - the 1911 Encyclopedia - full of odd-sounding phrases. Surely Wikipedia deserves better than this in 2006? The query above is typical - who was William de Braose and to what do we owe his apparently unique fame in connection with the history of Sussex? Peter Shearan 11:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am still not over-satisfied with the result, but will leave it at that. At least the article is now under headings, and doesn't contain too much of the flavour of an early encyclopedia! I am sure others will now wish to amend what I have done, but it will be a more simple job with it being divided up. Incidentally, I have included the reference I quoted above under External links, so that readers have not completely lost all the "facts" given. I note, however, that at least one more modern reference doubts the authenticity of the date 477 given at the outset of the original article. Peter Shearan 12:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just added the section header for usability/etc Seagull123 Φ 20:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Portus Adurni

Under the Romans section, I have removed the reference to the Saxon-shore port Portus Adurni (Portchester Castle) being in the area that would become Sussex, as Portchester is in Hampshire near Gosport, and so is not relevant to this article. The reference to Anderita (Pevensey Castle) remains. Stuart Johnson, 09.36, 14 November 2008 (UTC) hi man

The Saxons

I have blanked the Saxons section and put a link in to the Kingdom of Sussex. It seems pointless duplicating info here, when there is already a full article on the history of the Saxons in Sussex.Wilfridselsey (talk) 12:42, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sussex

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Sussex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140526160017/http://www.go-ahead.com/media/news/2014-news/pr-23-05-2014.aspx to http://www.go-ahead.com/media/news/2014-news/pr-23-05-2014.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Homo heidelbergensis (10233446).jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced this picture (on the History of Sussex page) with another that has better provenance. Wilfridselsey (talk) 19:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]