Talk:History of Orkney
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 20, 2012. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Map
[edit]I'd be willing to produce a coastline map of Orkney, much like the one I'm currently working on for Shetland (see right). From that, I can add stuff that people send to me (coloured in various ways, dots for villages and towns, arrows for population movements etc.). Just let me know what you need, and I'll see what I can do. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:14, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Wow, that's an excellent map, much better than any of the CIA ones floating around! -- Joolz 18:22, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
- The place to ask is probably on Orkney Islands itself - but that style of map does seem to be of higher quality than the ones currently on that article. Secretlondon 18:38, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
- Well, I was particularly asking if a map would be of use to the history article, during the CotF. If so, I'll change my priorities and produce the basic Orkney map ASAP. If not, its priority will stay below that of several other maps (which are at various stages of completion), and so probably won't appear for months. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:52, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
The first version of my Orkney map is on the right. If someone can send me sources or locations, I can produce maps based on this. Stuff this might include could be:
- maps of archeological sites (my reference only has Skara Brae, but there' surely lots of stuff
- maps of viking and christian stuff
- WW1 stuff (I think I'll make a map showing the locations of the scuttled German ships) - fortifications, bases, etc.
- WW2 stuff (churchill barriers, more fortifications etc).
Or anything else anyone would like. If I don't hear from anyone, I'll probably just produce updated versions of the Orkney maps and leave it at that. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:02, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Orkney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070610085151/http://www.rosslyntemplars.org.uk/orkney%26shetland.htm to http://www.rosslyntemplars.org.uk/orkney%26shetland.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
My apologies for editing (a tidy up follows)
[edit]...however, much of the text is too Doric for an International Encyclopaedia. You know what you mean, I know it, but it's unclear in Plain English - you have to cater for furriners. For those who don't know what Doric is, it's a quasi-dialect reflecting Gaelic constructions carried uncorrected into English - for instance, Scots Gaelic has little sense of ownership, so "my boat" is "the boat that is with me" or something like it. The result is a far more widespread use of the passive tense, which dilutes the direct sense of hard history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.250.132.218 (talk) 00:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)