Talk:Historien om någon/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 04:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 04:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 

---

Lead

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• An informative lead that takes the scope of this book beyond the sighted: a tactile edition for readers with impaired vision has also been produced by the Swedish Library of Talking Books and Braille, with tactile illustrations.

Synopsis

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• A concise yet descriptive synopsis.

Production

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• An excellent summary of the challenges and achievements of this book: The margins and edges of the book are particularly constructed to retain continuity in the setting across pages, to overcome the physical limitations of a printed book which by necessity consists of pages as separate units.

Reception and legacy

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• This is a disciplined and neutral section of this article. Well scribed.
• it is appropriate to present the plus and minus of the tactile edition - including - it still succeeds in being accessible to blind children.
• it is appropriate to present the plus and minus of the musical play adaptation for readers.

References

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• All examined; appropriate

External Links

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• Noted.

 

---

End Matter

1. Is it is Broad in its coverage?

• Yes, the article points out that this book - a classic among children's books - also takes the child into the arena of the book as a play space. The tactile capacity of this book lent itself to the unsighted thus opening the book to a much larger audience of children.
• The book also includes references with regard to assistive technology for the disabled, as explained above, the book opened new experiences for the blind.

1. Is it Verifiable with no original research?

• No original research was noted.

1. Does it follow WP:NPOV Neutral Point of View?

• Neutral point of view is presented in this article.

1. Is it stable?

• This article came to life on 11 January 2021
• It has had 270 page views in that time.
• No evidence of edit warring noted.

1. Top editors are

    * Alexandra IDV

1. It is illustrated by images ?

• 4 illustrations, all appropriate
• The book cover is a work of art and qualifies as fair use under the copyright law of the United States.
• The page example is a work of art and qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law.
• The photograph of the illustrator extracted from another file and dated before 1960 (he passed in 1954); the work is non-artistic (journalistic, etc.) and has been created before 1 January 1971 (SFS 1960:729, § 49a).
• The theatre photograph has a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Overall

• A most interesting article describing a pioneering book that opened up a tactile experience and also create a new dimension of the book for children: book as play space. Disciplined writing, well done.

Conclusion

•  Passed
  • @Whiteguru: Thank you very much for your thorough review! I appreciate it a lot.--Alexandra^IDV 08:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)