Talk:Historical ecology

Anthropology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

(Untitled)

You do not drop the other shoe. Yes, the whole world has been tainted by human culture, however, we all know that, once neglected and/or our stuff is removed, there is no place on earth that cannot return to the natural landscape or some variant of the natural landscape, however, the natural landscape none-the-less.

I'm not sure why you do not talk about the potential return of natural controls and processes although I have run into this myopia before. If the earth cannot control "itself" then it must be groomed by the very same species that knocked it off its equilibrium? Certainly there are whole schools of science being developed and many high paying jobs tracking this with envious eyes, but I don't think it will work. The it that won't work is the continued grooming of the entire earth.

I suggest you include SEE ALSO.

e.g. See also

Cultural landscapes Ecology Natural landscaping Natural environment Soundscape etc. Rstafursky (talk) 15:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improving Wikipedia's coverage of Historical Ecology

Hello! We invite you to take a look at our proposed wikiproject: Historical Ecology. Annadestinmccown (talk) 22:40, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Historical ecology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051025170240/http://www.geo.uni-bayreuth.de/bodenkunde/terra_preta/ to http://www.geo.uni-bayreuth.de/bodenkunde/terra_preta/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]