Jump to content

Talk:Historical buildings and structures of Zion National Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Historical" or "Historic"?

[edit]

I think this article should be moved to change the word Historical to Historic, since it's really about the structures of historic significance, not everything old. Don't want to step on any toes, though; what do others think? Ntsimp (talk) 13:23, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no particular opinion on the subject; I see your point, but it's a pretty fine distinction that seems to be widely confused. Acroterion (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Historical buildings and structures of Zion National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]