Talk:Hiroshima–Nagasaki Protocol
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Depending on the terms of this Agreement, this may be among \*the\* most important pages on Wikipedia. Y is there not a talk page?
Y1: I notice that there are two versions of Hiroshima–Nagasaki_Protocol: one with an "n-dash", and another with an "m–dash". Y? Y in the world would there be a divergence on a difficult to recognize character for those who are not \*technicallY literate like "-" and "–"? Which is Wiki Standard? Y2: Is there a redirect from Nagasaki-Hiroshima to Hiroshima-Nagasaki? Y3: Y can I not find the source text for the Convention in the hi.per.link of the main page? Y4: So much of what I produce carries an enormous debt in what is available at gifted-debt on Wikipedia. Y is it so hard raising funds during Your fundraising drives? I can understand Y it would be dangerous for human knowledge for Wikipedia to come under government dependencies. Would You consider redescribing Your work offerings as offered under "gifted-debt", leaving it to the recipient to decide if theY are in debt?
I do ♥ Your Works. Please let me know of anY faults that I express. I want to get better at Wikipedia contributions and ∰talks, but I can't afford the time Yet to RTM. Did the "\*" break or come out of the page? I want to make sure it doesn't, and translates in all encodings as successfullY as the sYn.tax permits.
粘土人
This talk comment is written in BLESSings using Some Simpler Spellings, with some higher gui:dances from Humble and Harm/less (HH) Hands.
\* Spec Note: Those so described maY not have all required technical literacies for the recognition event.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hiroshima–Nagasaki Protocol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100702161333/http://www.2020visioncampaign.org/filestorage/409/File/1/CitiesAppeal.pdf to http://www.2020visioncampaign.org/filestorage/409/File/1/CitiesAppeal.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)