Talk:Hinge and Bracket

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Repeated info

This is a very repetitive article. Much of the information is presented twice, or even three times. Would anyone mind if someone tried to reorganize the article? -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:21, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I second that! There's a lot of really excellent material in the article, but it is in sore need of reorganising into coherence. I'd be willing to have a go myself, if there are no other volunteers – but not for a little while yet. – Tim riley (talk) 22:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please do, Tim. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:43, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ifor you are not going to rewrite some of the article, perhaps I could do so. If no one objects. Jakescows (talk) 14:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of 'the appeal'

This whole section was written in a very non-encyclopedic way. I've got no problem with it being rewritten but for no I'm going to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.109.207.43 (talk) 22:10, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reinstatement of "The Appeal"

Will revisit style and breakdown of this section in due course. HBF109 (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs some work

This article needs a major trim and sources. --John (talk) 18:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NOT copied from other sources

I wrote the vast majority of this and so can vouch for it being my original text. Some paragraphs have been copied from here and reposted on the official H&B site. Which is fine with me. HBF109 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What were your sources for what you have written though? You must cite them, or the material is original research. Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I started removing parts of the article before seeing this conversation. However, http://www.hingeandbracket-official.co.uk/ quite clearly has a copyright symbol for its content. Either it is a copyright violation or excessive original research and should be cut down to size. 87.113.177.6 (talk) 01:01, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'Personae'

If you must have a Latin plural for persona it should be personata. And the English plural personas would be much better. Guyal of Sfere (talk) 21:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hinge and Bracket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hinge and Bracket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110301054453/http://www.rsamd.ac.uk/staff/Underwood_Christopher.html to http://www.rsamd.ac.uk/staff/Underwood_Christopher.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:32, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfilled template removed from article

Unfilled template

==Plot==


==Characters==
{{main|List of Hinge and Bracket characters}}


==Production==
===Development===


===Casting===


===Music===


===Locations===


===Notability===

==Episodes==
{{Main article|List of Hinge and Bracket episodes}}


==Sketch and other appearances==


==Adverts==


==In other media==
===Audio===


===Books===



==Other countries==


==Spin-offs==

===Film===



===Television===

===Theatre===


==Home media==
===DVD releases===

This template was added, presumably with the intention of it being filled out, but some time has passed without any content being added. I have moved it here for the time being. Poltair (talk) 07:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Hinge & Bracket.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Stackton Tressel

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

This seems to be an uncontroversial merge - the Stackton article is poor and has barely been edited since 2014. All useful content is now in the main Hinge and Bracket article, so I am going ahead to merge. Cnbrb (talk) 12:06, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Stackton Tressel article is a short, poorly sourced article and hardly a notable topic for a standalone article. It should simply be merged into the main Hinge and Bracket article, as it has no significance beyond the Hinge and Bracket stage act. Cnbrb (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the Stackton Tressel article is weak and hardly notable. I'm not even sure that any of its content is worth merging into this article, beyond the passing mention already in the lede, possibly better merged with Dear Ladies. Having suggested that, as the content potentially worth saving are the notes regarding filming locations and the inspiration for the name of the village, and these details are unsourced, maybe the article is really a candidate for deletion. Poltair (talk) 09:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree - I'm just trying to be generous. Unless we uncover reliable sources detailing the misfortunes of Teddy and Peggy ("Oh, she hasn't?"), I feel we can safely change it to a redirect to this article. Cnbrb (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.