Jump to content

Talk:Hilton Moscow Leningradskaya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requesting corrections (prior to doing it myself)
1. It's not Gothic. Surprising enough, Komsomolskaya Square facade and tower ornaments were designed in Pseudo-Russian style mimicking Schusev's Kazansky_Rail_Terminal. OK, it's got a steeple but it's not enough to be Gothic.
2. Nothing is said about the legendary inefficiency of this hotel. Emporis.com says it's using only 19% of space (rentable-to-total). Khrushev (04/11/1955 "Redundancy" decree) says it has 356 rooms instead of 1000 that could be built for the money. Any reliable backing to any of these numbers?
3. It wasn't supposed to be 'the finest luxury hotel in Moscow'. Mordvinov's Ukraina ranked higher. That's why Mordvinov received Stalin prize first class, while Polyakov got second class (and was stripped of the prize in 1955).
NVO 22:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leningradskaja001.JPG Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Leningradskaja001.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Leningradskaja001.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 June 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Hilton Moscow Leningradskaya HotelHilton Moscow Leningradskaya – It's not necessary to include Hotel as a keyword in the name of the property. It won't hurt the common name. Valgetova (talk) 13:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hilton Moscow Leningradskaya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]