Jump to content

Talk:Hilde Levi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHilde Levi has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 24, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 5, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hilde Levi helped develop the radiocarbon dating equipment used to date the Grauballe Man?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 9, 2017.

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hilde Levi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 19:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. OK
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. All OK
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. OK, though it does rely on rather few sources.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). OK
2c. it contains no original research. No sign of it.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. It does, but perhaps there should be a little more on how she found out about radiocarbon dating, and about autoradiography; and indeed what she did in induced radioactivity - I think an extra sentence on each would be helpful. This could mean additional sources.
Thanks.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). OK
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. OK
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. No problem.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. The photographer for Levi's portrait is unknown so the image is incorrectly tagged, should probably be Anonymous-EU which only requires 50 years so apparently valid here.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Obviously it would be nice to have another image (Levi in Bohr's lab, etc) if any such exist.
7. Overall assessment. An interesting and crisply-written article.
Photographs
We could, but no, it's not very good. Not to worry, it's not a showstopper. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:19, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

Thanks for working on this article. Still, the lead needs expansion to properly summarize the article per MOS:LEAD. Hekerui (talk) 10:50, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded the lead Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Super. Looks as if you'll have to write an article on Peter Pringsheim! Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good! Hekerui (talk) 22:08, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hilde Levi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]