Talk:High Seas Fleet/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Fix the awkward tags that I've added.
- Do my changes fix the problems? As for the one "why" tag, that is actually a big question. Scheer said he thought the first time the fleets came together went well and wanted to make a second attack, to inflict further damage and to keep Jellicoe guessing. Many think he was covering his arse for making a terrible decision and simply didn't know where Jellicoe was. Parsecboy (talk) 18:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Fix the awkward tags that I've added.
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Sometimes state is missing or spelled out in the publisher locations. Please standardize.
- Fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 18:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sometimes state is missing or spelled out in the publisher locations. Please standardize.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Explain a division is half a squadron.
- Added. Parsecboy (talk) 18:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Explain a division is half a squadron.
- B. Focused:
- Add the {{lang-de|}} template to German terminology. You use English language terminology except for Admiralstab.
- Is that really necessary? I've seen it argued by several people at various FACs/ACRs (I know Ed dealt with this on one of his South American BBs) that the lang template was superfluous (i.e., anyone reading an article about a topic from country "y" can be reasonably trusted to assume the translation is from the language of country "y"). Parsecboy (talk) 18:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Add the {{lang-de|}} template to German terminology. You use English language terminology except for Admiralstab.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: