Talk:High Flux Australian Reactor

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal High Flux Australian Reactor is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Timing error

The article says "HIFAR was permanently shut down on 30 January 2007", then says "In 2007 OPAL, a 20MW replacement reactor was commissioned" and "The two reactors ran in parallel for six months". How does that work? I've added the Contradict template — Cauterite (talk) 12:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite simple, as the ^[1] page shows. This is the proper reference page on the website of the operators of HIFAR. Decommisioning of the HIFAR reactor commenced in 2007 and will be completed in 2018. A lengthy process. The OPAL reactor which replaced HIFAR first went critical at 11.25 pm on 12 August 2006 - before decommissioning of the HIFAR reactor started.Ltaglieri (talk) 06:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that the details are correct, the commissioning of OPAL commenced in 2006 and during this commissioning it was run in parallel with HIFAR.

References

^ http://www.ansto.gov.au/discovering_ansto/history_of_ansto/hifar

History

Did not Mark Oliphant design HIFAR in the late 1940s? The "hi flux" bit was a high flux of thermal neutrons, far more than was needed for a simple power reactor. No doubt it could be have been used to make Pu239, although rather slowly. Nuclear medicines would not have been the motivation since they did not exist then.203.221.246.141 (talk) 08:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.ansto.gov.au/discovering_ansto/history_of_ansto/hifar

[1]