Talk:Hibiscus × rosa-sinensis
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
regarding removal of seminolepride.jpg, weblink
[edit]Wikipedia is not a place for advertisement, we cannot afford to have commercial site links, advertisements here. Deliberately adding a image from a commercial site at the begining of the gallery is nothing but spamming and advertisement. The link, and the concerned image will be removed. --vineeth 04:54, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Questions about rosa-sinensis
[edit]Recently two Hibiscus rosa-sinensis plants were planted in the back of our house. One is doing really well, but the other is looking, well, a bit sickly. I can't understand why one plant would look so good and the other would look like it lived five years of it's life in a desert. I've looked on the leaves of the ugly one. I could find hide nor hair of any bugs, why is it sick while the other is healthy? Please, are there any master gardeners who know? Botangirl 15:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Temperature tolerance
[edit]The article states that Hibiscus rosa-sinensis does not tolerate temperatures below 10°. That's not my experience at all; the ones I know, which look like the canonical red Hibiscus, can tolerate temperatures down to 0°. Is this an exception? Otherwise the text should be changed. Groogle (talk) 02:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Winter soil temperatures and thermal areas
[edit]I added a footnote and some text in the Cultivation content about Hibiscus planting and care. Interesting information on air and soil temperature plus planting locations. Df2 (talk) 06:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101225013002/http://www.arboretum.org/index.php/news/the_cultural_potential_of_the_hibiscus_to_southern_california to http://www.arboretum.org/index.php/news/the_cultural_potential_of_the_hibiscus_to_southern_california
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524024042/http://www.rjptonline.org/RJPT/RJPT_4_3_2011_Abstract.pdf to http://www.rjptonline.org/RJPT/RJPT_4_3_2011_Abstract.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Two articles on Hibiscus
[edit]There are two articles on the same subject viz Hibiscus and Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. I think these pages should be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanu N (talk • contribs) 18:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- They are not on the same subject. One is on the genus Hibiscus, which has many species, the other is on one of the species within the genus, Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Native range
[edit]@Tedster007: I think we should keep eFloras ([1]). eFloras has several citations goes back to Linnaeus while Kew merely makes an assertion. Invasive Spices (talk) 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Kew has considerable authority over eFloras... Tedster007 21:08, 24 February 2022
- Probably true. I don't know who writes eFloras. Still if Kew make no effort at a citation... Invasive Spices (talk) 24 February 2022 (UTC)