Talk:Hey Hey Hey

Hey Hey Hey has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 18, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Katy Perry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Katy Perry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Katy Perry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Katy PerryWikipedia:WikiProject Katy PerryTemplate:WikiProject Katy PerryKaty Perry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Dark pop

I do not believe the source is actually stating this. The Guardian article states "Elsewhere, Chained to the Rhythm is subtly woke, so as not to alienate listeners in Trumpland, Hey Hey Hey deals in dark dream pop a la Banks and Grimes (“I’m Marilyn Monroe in a monstertruck”, she sings, purposely stilted), and Power is all empowerment and retro funk – think Roar via Bruno Mars." Seperating the genres is not advised per WP:STICKTOSOURCE. I only really read this as a dark take on dream pop. The individual genre is not mentioned. Unless you want to make "dark dream pop" its own thing. But then you shouldn't wikilink it. Thoughts? Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of GAN

@Cartoon network freak: Just wanted to ask why you removed the GAN for this? Aoba47 (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: It was grounds for an instant fail. — Calvin999 19:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Calvin999: Thank you for the response! What were the grounds for the instant fail for this article? I honestly have not read this article that thoroughly so I apologize if it is obvious. I do not mean to be nosy, but I would just like to know to avoid making similar mistakes in my own projects and GANs. Aoba47 (talk) 19:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: It was released as a single on 12 January and nominated for GAN the next day. It is very likely that the content will change drastically, meaning that whatever is reviewed will be subject to further changes and expansion, and so would need reviewing again under GAR. The grounds for instant fail is not because the nominator has done anything wrong, it is because the history is unstable as a result of being released as a single and making it prone to a lot of edits the past few weeks, and articles are supposed to be stable and not being changed regularly. I recommended that the nominator wait for the article to become stable again when the songs popularity dies down and nominate in a few months. — Calvin999 19:38, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for the response, and I apologize for prying into this. I still have a lot to learn and I am always trying to improve my own abilities on Wikipedia so I greatly appreciate your explanation. I completely agree with your rationale about this matter; I wonder if a note should be added to either Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs or Wikipedia:WikiProject Music or both that would advise users against nominating singles (and albums) that were recently released (and by recent I mean within a few months). Either way, stability would definitely be under question for this, and I would also argue that it would not be comprehensive as new articles could be written about it during the weeks and/or months following its release. I apologize for the long response; just wanted to say thank you and that I agree with you. Aoba47 (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is an unwritten rule that people should wait, it ties in with the stability and coverage criteria. Whether they do or not is another question. — Calvin999 19:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, that makes perfect sense to me. That is the main reason why I worked on articles about older subject matters as I know that a majority (if not all) of the sources are already out there. Aoba47 (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]