Jump to content

Talk:Het Schip

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move up from stub class

[edit]

I have just added significantly to this page (added all the historical background section) and backed up my additions with a good amount of sources I think. Therefore I removed the stub tags and think that WikiProject Museums, WikiProject Architecture, and WikiProject Netherlands should no longer categorize this article as a stub either.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Acire93 (talkcontribs) 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Done.-ELEKHHT 21:03, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move up from low importance

[edit]

Not sure if this is the proper venue but I also believe that this building should be moved up from low-importance to at least mid. When I took a tour of the building, the tour guide mentioned that the building was going to become a UNESCO world heritage site soon. When this happens, I think it would be appropriate to bump up this museum's importance rating.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Acire93 (talkcontribs) 13 June 2014 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Het Schip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]