Talk:Herman Jay Cohen

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Birthdate

[1]

Bias in article

This article is severely biased, and makes a childish attempt to paint Prof. Cohen as some sort of collaborator with African thugs. Please note the extraneous edit comments in the history of the page, where one editor notes that a particular section failed to capture that Cohen is an "evil SOB." What is this, myspace? I think the kiddies need to go home and leave the Wiki pages that aren't about pets and Britney Spears to the adults. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.251.100 (talk) 12:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More Bias

Furthermore, the article cites as its source a single article by the political hack James P. Lucier, perhaps best known for butchering the writings of James Monroe in a pathetic editing job. Also, to make things worse, the person who sourced this cherry picks quotes and takes them out of context to further their purile vandalism. I have attempted to make some edits which will address this, but the bias makes a complete overhaul necessary.

Please refrain from referring to edits made in good faith as vandalism. When posting on article talkpages you can sign your comments with four tildes (~) at the end. All content needs to conform to a neutral point of view and needs sources. Perspicacite 13:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

My edits are not vandalism, they are merely an attempt to clean up an article which has been heavily slanted by an author with a clear cut agenda and bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.251.100 (talk) 22:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At no point in time have I or anyone else referred to your edits as vandalism. You, incorrectly, referred to my edits as vandalism. I again remind you to sign your comments with four tildes (~). The content you add needs to be sourced and needs to conform to a neutral point of view. When commenting, please refrain from making personal attacks and incivility. Perspicacite 23:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub

What remains is a stub. ---Dagme (talk) 15:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]