Jump to content

Talk:USV Hercules

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 24 July 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hercules (football club)USV Hercules – The common name realease us from the need to use a dab. gidonb (talk) 14:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 08:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • USV Hercules provides 1150 sources in Google News versus 0 for "Hercucles football club" and 0 for "Hercules voetbalclub". "Hercules voetbalclub" has no hits on Google Books, "Hercules football club" only false positives, "USV Hercules" has true positives. The name Hercules in football is also used for clubs in Zaandam and Alicante, so Hercules (football club) is not a satisfying name for anything but a disambiguation page. gidonb (talk) 13:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References in national newspapers:

  • Telegraaf: "FC Groningen heeft zich ondanks een snelle achterstand tegen de amateurs van USV Hercules gewoongeplaatst voor de volgende ronde van de KNVB-beker."
  • Algemeen Dagblad: "Brandweer hoeft niet ver te rijden naar brand bij Utrechtse sportclub USV Hercules"
  • Trouw: "Plaats van handeling was de accommodatie van voetbalclub USV Hercules aan de Voorveldselaan." (topic)
  • Volkskrant: "FC Utrecht heeft dinsdagavond FC Oss verslagen (3-2). De club uit de Eredivisie kwam op het veld van de amateurclub USV Hercules terug na een achterstand van 2-0." (topic)

Please note also that other wikis use USV Hercules consistently. Don't know how we reached this one. Change looks trivial to me from such an awful baseline. gidonb (talk) 15:17, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.