Talk:Herbert F. Johnson Museum of Art/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: one found and tagged.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 15:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is not reasonably well written, it appears to be thrown together from information on the institution's website. Elementary mistakes of punctuation and capitalisation abound. The organisation of information is poor and the lead is too short and does not fully summarise the article.

   The Architecture section appears to be a copyvio We established that the other website copied from this article.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   One primary source supplies all but one of the sources.

   One dead link found and tagged.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The whole article could do with expansion cited to independent reliable sources.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Reads like a tour guide

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   File:Artmuseum22.jpg needs a better description on the file page than just "took it"

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This is a straightforward fail. The nominator has been indefinitely blocked. perhaps someone else can sort it out and when it meets the GA criteria renominate. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)