Talk:Herb Wesson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

African diaspora

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Cleveland

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: State Legislatures Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cleanup needed; conflict of interest

The article has many puffy words, and the info is often not well sourced. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 08:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This fellow is such an important figure, he should have a much better article than this one. There are plenty of sources. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 08:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did some heavy editing, but I am leaving the tag at the top of the page until somebody else removes it. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 08:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

recent deletions

Herb Wesson's family information was recently deleted.

Per Wikipeida: When information is unsourced, and it is doubtful any sources are available for the information, it can be removed. If a source can be found, but you do not wish to supply one yourself, you can add the template [citation needed].

This information was pretty easy to find. Obviously, it was deleted without even a simple "google". Googling the deleted sentence [1] provides the information from not only Wesson's own web page, an article from the LA Sentinel, and other sources further down the web page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phatblackmama (talk • contribs)

You misunderstand our policies regarding BLPs. I provided the relevant links on your talk page, but perhaps you didn't read them. Per WP:BLP, when material in a BLP is removed due to sourcing concerns, you need to provide include the required reliable sourcing prior to restoring it. Stating that the sources appear in a general Google search doesn't meet requirements for inclusion, the burden is on the editor wishing to restore the content to ensure the material is reliably sourced. In addition, I also directed your attention to WP:BLPNAME, which is also policy. The names of family members are generally not included in BLPs unless they are individually notable.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you, Jezebel's Ponyo for explaining. I read WP:BLPNAME.

WP:BLPNAME says "The names of any immediate, former, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced" and "names of family members who are not also notable public figures must be removed from an article if they are not properly sourced." Per WP:BLPNAME, these names that you are removing are properly sourced and therefore may be included.

I found nothing in WP:BLPNAME to support your statement "family members are generally not included in BLPs unless they are individually notable". Contrary to that, numerous California politicians listed on Wesson's page mention by name those politician's non-notable spouses and children. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Mayor Eric Garcetti, Rep. Karen Bass, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, D.A. Gil Garcetti, Councilman Nate Holden.

I await clarification. Phatblackmama (talk) 00:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Phatblackmama: It is common practice that the names of family members who are not independently notable are not included in a BLP. This is done to protect their privacy. The portion of WP:BLPNAME that applies in this case is "The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons. The names of any immediate, former, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced, subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject (emphasis mine). As the names have been removed per WP:BLPNAME, the "subject to editorial discretion" clause of the policy kicks in. That is, the names may be included if there is consensus to do so in this specific case if you can make the argument that "such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject". I'm not sure a full Request for Comment is necessary to determine if there is consensus to include the names of private individuals in this case; a post to Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard will probably be sufficient for feedback. On a final note, what appears in other articles has no relevance here. Wikipedia has nearly six million articles and it's impossible for volunteers to maintain consistency across all of them. What is of utmost importance to this project is that when BLP and sourcing issues do arise, we do our best to adhere to the policies in place, balancing the desire to inform readers through the inclusion of reliably sourced content with the necessity of protecting those we write about from potential harm.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

His name in the lead

Hi. It's my contention that Mr. Wesson's name in the lead should be the one he used publicly. Do we have a WP:guideline or WP:policy that says otherwise? Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]