Talk:Henry Mayhew

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

General

he wrote a flower girl —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.42.74 (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this supposed to mean something? Paul B (talk) 10:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Under 'Early Life' we see "He was born in London, one of seventeen children of Joshua Mayhew." Another fine example of asexual reproduction by the fathers of notable figures.

hear, hear Actio (talk) 03:24, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Figaro in London, a play

Was there a play and an illustated weekly with the same name? --Radh (talk) 15:38, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology

If he fled to Paris in 1835, and spent 10 years there, how was he able to become co-editor of Punch in 1841? AuntFlo (talk) 13:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It’s also confusing that one paragraph ends: “However, this venture lost Mayhew so much money that he was forced to appear in a court of bankruptcy in 1846.”, to be followed by : “In 1842, Mayhew contributed to the pioneering Illustrated London News. By this time, he had become reasonably secure financially, had settled his debts, and married Jane Jerrold, the daughter of his friend Douglas Jerrold.” It}s hard to follow what state his finances were in, or how stable, especially when events are given in reverse order. Jock123A (talk) 16:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Henry Mayhew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131105212618/http://nils.lib.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A4000.01.0140 to http://nils.lib.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A4000.01.0140

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Henry Mayhew/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This is a decent little article, and with a bit of work could be a little gem. The language needs to be tightened slightly - editorialising creeps in here and there, and a quotation of his journalism wouldn't go amiss. A bit of spit and polish needed to make this shine. Edofedinburgh 02:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 02:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 17:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

I hope no one will object too much if I comment that this, and the article on London Labour... miss the forest for the trees. This work has been of immense importance and is essentially a work of early anthropological attention to the lives of poor city dwellers in the home country for which it was written, yet this is lost in minor details, and even more so in the article on the book itself, which actually denigrates the extremely detailed descriptions of the work of the people who are profiled as "almost pedantic."

It is enough to cause a person to weep. In this article, we read of the worried responses of some of the people studied but nothing of its effects or reception by others—those for whom the articles and then books were written. Further, there is no reference to the work in the two articles on Andrew Halliday. I write this in the hopes that someone will give this ground-breaking work—evidence of its importance is alluded to but not explored in the two Wikipedia articles themselves—its due attention, with neither fear nor favor. Please! Actio (talk) 03:33, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]