This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Henry Ling Roth is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Henry Ling Roth/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I would like to highlight that this article needs to cite sources to verify claims that Roth made worthwhile contributions to anthropology.
Roth was a product of his time, certainly, and the racism inherent in ethnography at this time needs to be recognised. With regard to Tasmanian Aboriginals, Roth's analytical text about these people shows in many passages that he followed a trend of anthropological thought that had little scientific basis and revealed more about the narrow, post-colonial mind of the English scientist than about the native people of Tasmania.
Furthermore the article's suggestion that the Tasmanian Aboriginals have 'vanished' is not only false, but offensive to the descendants of Tasmanian Aborigines who are alive and well. That his book on Aboriginal Tasmanians is a 'standard' text, in any modern sense, is also completely false
Last edited at 01:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC).
Substituted at 17:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)