Talk:Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

United States: Nebraska / Omaha Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Nebraska portal This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska - Omaha.

Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo

Page needs editing

The number of spelling and grammar errors are obvious at first glance and should be taken care of —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.53.145 (talk) 01:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weasel words

"Today, it is considered by many to be one of the top zoos..."

Can anyone find some references to back this up? Cburnett 20:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I found a link but not exactly the best of sources. Cburnett 03:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I remember right it is one of the top 10 US zoos. Nice or in evil (talk) 17:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Internal linking

Seems like a lot of unnecessary internal linking is in this article. Is it really necessary to link every unit of measurment? Seems a bit much to me. I like WP guidelines for internal links. Too many links are distracting. Hope that helps. A mcmurray 03:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also I am pretty sure the type of information contained in the fee table is frowned upon on wikipedia. It's place might be Wikitravel. A mcmurray 06:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to lean toward the liberal usage of links. My general guideline is one link per section (see Lied Jungle for example) if long enough because I don't want to have to go searching for a link. My choice is to leave as is but that's me.

As for prices: I agree. Instead, I thought it'd be interesting to make it historical so I hit archive.org and got prices back to 1999. The near doubling of admission in less than a decade is quite surprising & interesting and I think warrants encyclopedic inclusion instead of wikitravel. Cburnett 06:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information available

--MONGO 07:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admissions fees

Is it really necessary to have a section on admissions fees? Funnyhat (talk) 21:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Current year: no. Span of near a decade: historical interest. If you have an prices that date back to 1894...I'd find that interesting too. Cburnett (talk) 23:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures?

I have a really sweet pic of the rare white aligator. Would it be appropriate to post? 208.188.113.180 (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Zootrainlogo.jpg

The image Image:Zootrainlogo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what is that thang sharks swim above you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.185.176.125 (talk) 16:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forthcoming changes

This article might be of interest. GreenReaper (talk) 01:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]