Talk:Henry Brooke, 11th Baron Cobham

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.

Kent Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Merge with Henry Brooke, 8th Baron Cobham

These articles apparently refer to the same individual. This article should be merged with Henry Brooke, 8th Baron Cobham, which is larger. Why is there confusion about the number? He is the eleventh entry on the list of Barons Cobham. Rbraunwa 16:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for my part, if there were to be a merge, I'd say that the erroneous "8th" should have whatever can be verified from it merged in here. The fact that its author went to the wrong number implicates her or him somewhat in my view. Other than some petty vandalism, this one checks out. Crowbait 17:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

date of death

"24 January 1618 (Old Style)/3 February 1619 (New Style)" and "Cobham, aged and sick, was released from the Tower in 1618, and died a year later"
If 3.2.1619 is NS (greg.), then 24.1.*1619* (OS, jul.) may be the right date of death, not 1618.
~~ 24.1.2018 by vor400