Talk:Hemigrapsus sexdentatus

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2021 and 1 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Edort930, Chlolow22. Peer reviewers: BrendenB2002.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

That reference appears to be talking about Cancer productus, a completely different crab... 203.184.26.139 (talk) 12:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference (4) is indeed talking about a North American rock crab. Not this species. Additionally the comment is an anecdotal one and does not add much if anything to the description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.17.209.162 (talk) 11:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.

For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter, here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you. --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:31, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I would recommend adding more to the article such as more about breeding and reproduction and variation in the sexes as well as more information on predation and what they eat and how they eat. Otherwise the information present is good it just needs to be built upon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrendenB2002 (talk • contribs) 06:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]