Talk:Helmut Schmidt University

Helmut Schmidt University was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 19, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 7, 2007.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the test for enrollment at Germany's Helmut Schmidt University involves not an intelligence test, but military training and troop procedures?

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Helmut Schmidt University article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Germany: Hamburg Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hamburg portal This article is supported by the Hamburg task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: European / German C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

4 faculty?

I think there was a misunderstanding of the meaning of "faculty." There are indeed four departments ("faculties"), but "faculty" in the infobox refers to the number of professors/teachers. I don't know how many profs are actually at Helmut Schmidt University (I haven't heard of it before), and I can't find the actual number of professors on the website (at least not in English, and I don't speak a lick of German). Could somebody find the actual number of professors and correct it? Meanwhile, I'm changing the number of faculty on the infobox. Lockesdonkey 02:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the German source was too verbose, but they very openly displayed that it had 4 faculties. Maybe in Germany, faculties are study courses? Look at the website if you want more proof. Under the faculties heading, they have the four courses of study. Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 21:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The German word "Fakultäten" in this case refers to departments each harbouring a selection of different study courses. All in all some questionable English, I reedited some of the grammatical and spelling errors. Regards - Lt Becker (Student at the HSU)

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

Hello there AD. Congrats on the RFA. Okay here is the DL. Great prose and it follows WP:MOS quite well. However, this article needs some work. First of all there is not enough information. Especially, in the entire history section. Second, There is a overall lack of sources, granted it does have some, but not really enough. Finally, and the real biggy, 8 out of the 10 notes are not exactly WP:RS. Need to get some 3rd party in there. Can't wait to see the final product. Any questions, feel free to ask. --Thε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 19:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I will try and work on it. Thanks for the review. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 21:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is little in the way of references to be done I am afraid. I suppose that this does not therefore meet the criteria. Oh well - maybe I will resubmit if I can locate some better refs. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but in the condition it is in, I have to fail it. --Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 21:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Helmut Schmidt University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]