Talk:Helmet of Coțofenești

Romania Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyediting, etc.

I did some copyediting (please note that a citation goes immediately after the punctuation mark, not before), and wanted to explain why I deleted "exceptional discovery" from the lede. I have no doubt that it was, but I was unclear which sense of "exceptional" was meant (possibly both): "exceptional" because it was a stray/unique find for the area, or because of its exceptional quality and significance in Geto-Dacian archaeology? The latter claim, which seems likely, should be attributed to a source.

Also, I wanted to note that this would've made a good DYK item for the WP main page (I see that it's fairly new, but past the DYK "sell by" date), so if the authors have other goodies like this in store, I would urge them to nominate them.

I have perhaps confused two different discussions of Mithraic iconography; if I did, it's because these were scattered in two different places in the description, without any connection made between the two passages, and I assumed they were referring to a single iconographical interpretation.

The gallery was redundant, as all the images already appear in the article. There was some unnecessary use of parameters for the image files, which caused the top image to be proportionally too large.

One last point: is "shirt knife" possibly meant to be "short knife"? And I'm not finding any such thing called a "goal beaker." Thanks, it was enjoyable to learn of this piece. Cynwolfe (talk) 20:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the cleanup! I posted it as DYK and I will double check the things you pointed out. Regards!--Codrin.B (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that the phrases "shirt knife" and "goal beaker" remain. Just wanted to make sure you didn't mean "short knife," and some other kind of beaker, since I don't find the phrase "goal beaker" in a Google Books search and at the moment have no guess what type of beaker is meant. Cynwolfe (talk) 16:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing this. It was a typo. In fact, authors in the book speak about short knife and gold beaker., I corrected the section. Now, I am sure you can find these references within Google books Please try "gold beaker and Cotofenesti" http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=gold%20beaker%20cotofenesti&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp and further http://books.google.ca/books?id=Ioc9AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA194&dq=gold+beaker+cotofenesti&hl=en&ei=pwiBTdqWE8m4tweG5u3SCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=gold%20beaker%20cotofenesti&f=false Again, thank youBoldwin (talk) 19:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]